Thanks, heureka, for showing how to find that oblique asymptote....I was going to go through it but I was working on another problem......besides......I couldn't have presented it better, anyway!!!
I want to point out one more thing.....the remainder of (24)/(x-3) means that we actually don't have a perfectly linear asymptote when x is relatively "small." However, as heureka shows by limit analysis, this "fiddly" asymptotic behavior disappears as x aproaches "large" positive and negative values. Thus, we can ignore the remainder and write the aymptote as heureka has done !!!!
y=x^2+6x-3/x-3 horizontal asymptote?
y=x3+6x2−3x1−3x1
degree top = 3
degree botton = 1
horizontal asymptote when degree top < degree botton
or degree top = degree botton
no horizontal asymptote! ( 3 < 1 no )
I believe that the questioner might have also meant this (but I'm not sure)....... y = (x^2+6x-3)/(x-3)
heureka is correct.....there is no horizontal asymptote in a "high/low" rational function.......(I believe we have a "slant" asymptote, instead)
Thank you Chris and Heureka,
I have wondered how to find 'slant' asumtotes (the proper name of these eludes me)
Can anyone show me?
Actually...I believe the proper term is "oblique asymptote"....here's a page that might help:
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/asymtote4.htm
y = (x^2+6x-3)/(x-3) 'slant' asumtotes ?
y=x2+6x−3x1−3
degree top = 2
degree botton = 1
'slant' asumtotes when degree top = degree botton + 1
'slant' asumtote yes ! ( 2 = 1 + 1 )
(x2+6x−3):(x−3)=x+9+24x−3−(x2−3x)0+9x−3−(9x−27)0+24
limx→±∞(24x−3)=0
'slant' asumtote y = x + 9
Thanks, heureka, for showing how to find that oblique asymptote....I was going to go through it but I was working on another problem......besides......I couldn't have presented it better, anyway!!!
I want to point out one more thing.....the remainder of (24)/(x-3) means that we actually don't have a perfectly linear asymptote when x is relatively "small." However, as heureka shows by limit analysis, this "fiddly" asymptotic behavior disappears as x aproaches "large" positive and negative values. Thus, we can ignore the remainder and write the aymptote as heureka has done !!!!