Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
 
+0  
 
0
982
8
avatar

solve for all values of "x" using whatever method. 3x^2 + 4x - 2 = 0

 Jun 18, 2014

Best Answer 

 #5
avatar+26396 
+11

3x2+4x2=0x?  

An easy way!

"p,q-formula":   x2+px+q=0

solution:  x1,2=p2±p24q

check:  x1+x2=px1x2=q

 

formula:  3x2+4x2=0

prepare for "p,q-formula":  3x2+4x2=0|:3

x2+43x23=0p=43q=23

 solution:  x1,2=12(43)±14(43)2+23

x1,2=23±433+2333

x1,2=23±103

x=x1=2+103=0.38742588672

x=x2=2103=1.72075922006

 

 check:   x1+x2=0.387425886721.72075922006=1.ˉ3=p

x1x2=0.38742588672×(1.72075922006)=0.ˉ6=q

.
 Jun 20, 2014
 #1
avatar+26396 
+11

3x^2 + 4x - 2 = 0     x?

3x2+4x2=03(x2+43x)=2|:3x2+43x=23x2+43x+(423)2=(x+423)2(423)2=23(x+423)2(423)2=23(x+23)2(23)2=23(x+23)2=(23)2+23

(x+23)2=23(23+1)(x+23)2=2353|±x+23=±2353x+23=±103x=23±103x=x1=2+103x=x2=2103

x1=0.38742588672

x2=1.72075922006

 Jun 19, 2014
 #2
avatar
+5

is there a simpler way? thanks.

 Jun 19, 2014
 #3
avatar+130466 
+5

heureka has shown the method known as "completing the square"...we can also use the "quadratic formula"

It's given by  

[-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)] / (2a)     where, in our case..... a= 3   b = 4    and c = -2   so we have....

[ -4 ± √(4^2 - 4(3)(-2))] / (2*3)  =

[ -4 ± √(16 + 24)] / (6) =

[ -4 ± √(40)] / (6) =

[ -4 ± 2√(10)] / (6)      (divide everything by 2)   =

[ -2 ± √(10)] / (3)

Note that this is exactly the same answer(s) as heureka's  !!!!

 

 Jun 19, 2014
 #5
avatar+26396 
+11
Best Answer

3x2+4x2=0x?  

An easy way!

"p,q-formula":   x2+px+q=0

solution:  x1,2=p2±p24q

check:  x1+x2=px1x2=q

 

formula:  3x2+4x2=0

prepare for "p,q-formula":  3x2+4x2=0|:3

x2+43x23=0p=43q=23

 solution:  x1,2=12(43)±14(43)2+23

x1,2=23±433+2333

x1,2=23±103

x=x1=2+103=0.38742588672

x=x2=2103=1.72075922006

 

 check:   x1+x2=0.387425886721.72075922006=1.ˉ3=p

x1x2=0.38742588672×(1.72075922006)=0.ˉ6=q

heureka Jun 20, 2014
 #6
avatar+118703 
+5

The quadratic formula, that CPhill used is definitely the way to go.  Why make it hardeer than necessary.

(The other answers are good value too)

This will help you remember it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8ezDEk3qCg

 Jun 20, 2014
 #7
avatar+130466 
0

Heureka, your method is definitely interesting......whether it's "easy" could be up for debate ...!!!

But......as I always say, if it works for you....go for it !!!!

 

 Jun 20, 2014
 #8
avatar+26396 
+1

I remember the question is:

solve for all values of "x" using whatever method

 Jun 23, 2014
 #9
avatar+118703 
0

Yes Heureka, your method was perfecty valid 

 Jun 23, 2014

2 Online Users